It was a friend of the University of Montana forestry professor calling to congratulate him.
“I'm not making this up,” the friend said. “I think you're a Nobel Peace Prize winner.”
But sure enough, after jumping on the Internet, there it was: Former Vice President Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change were sharing the prestigious 2007 award.
The U.N.'s climate change panel, of which Running is a member, provided virtually all of the information for Gore's film on global warming, “An Inconvenient Truth.”
The movie, which won an Academy Award earlier this year, is credited with bringing awareness of climate change to the forefront, and providing a foundation for fighting back.
While the panel is spread across the globe and includes 600 scientists and researchers, the excitement of its members Friday was electric, Running said.
“Individual Nobel recipients have a clue they're being considered,” Running said. “Even while drinking beer, nobody ever talked about this. We had no clue. We are completely overwhelmed.”
The e-mails and phone calls were flying fast and furious throughout the day.
“I've got e-mails from Europe pouring in,” he said. “I'm hearing from people all over.”
The IPCC was formed in 1988. It was established by two governmental bodies, the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program. The panel's role was to assess, in an objective and transparent fashion, the best available scientific and socioeconomic information on climate change around the world.
The panel was divided into three main groups of 200 individuals each, with three different headquarters: Boulder, Colo., England and the Netherlands. Each group was then assigned different tasks.
Running, a well-known ecologist and climate-change expert at UM, was appointed to Working Group 2, based in England. As a lead author for his part of the project, he was charged with helping to research the effects of global warming on North America.
“This is basically the culmination of three years worth of work,” he said. “I probably read about 400 to 500 research articles published around the world. I distilled that into about 50 papers, which ended up as about four or five pages in our chapter (Chapter 14).
“I never thought my name would be linked in any way, shape or form to something like this,” Running added. “I can almost certainly say that I won't write anything else the rest of my career that will have this type of impact.”
And it is an impact that Running hopes will reverberate across the planet.
“We've got to get past all the petty bickering and get to work,” he said. “This is about a big transition for society over the next 50 years. The path we are on is unsustainable.
“What the Nobel committee is saying is that we've got to wake up. We've got to change the course of the whole world.”
As for the panel's half of the $1.5 million prize money, Running isn't sure what will happen to his portion of the loot. Nor does he care.
“Maybe I'll get a check for a couple hundred dollars,” he said. “It doesn't really matter. I think that they will find some other way to collectively use the money.”
Gore, for the record, has said he will donate his half of the money to the Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan nonprofit organization.
And what's next for Running?
“I suppose I'm supposed to say something like I'm going to Disneyland,” he said with a laugh.
But there really isn't time to rest on his hard-won laurels.
“I've got a semester planned in Vienna, working on forest carbon (issues),” he said. “It's back to work.”
City editor John Smithers can be reached at 523-5257 or at jsmithers@missoulian.com.
To read the report
The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change report is available on the IPCC Web site www.ipcc.ch. To read Steve Running's work, go to http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/index.html click on the IPCC's full Working Group 2 report, and then Chapter 14.
Al Gore recognized for years of education effort
By SETH BORENSTEIN and LISA LEFF of the Associated Press
PALO ALTO, Calif. - For years, former Vice President Al Gore and a host of climate scientists were belittled and, worst of all, ignored for their message about how dire global warming is.
On Friday, they were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for their warnings about what Gore calls “a planetary emergency.”
Gore shared the prize with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations network of scientists. This scientific panel has explained the dry details of global warming in thousands of pages of footnoted reports every six years or so since 1990.
Gore, fresh from a near miss at winning the U.S. presidency in 2000, translated the numbers and jargon-laden reports into something people could understand. He made a slide show and went Hollywood.
His documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” won two Academy Awards and has been credited with changing the debate in America about global warming.
For Gore, it was all about the message.
“This is a chance to elevate global consciousness about the challenges that we face now,” he said Friday at the offices of the Alliance For Climate Protection, a nonprofit he founded. “The alarm bells are going off in the scientific community.”
Despite a live global stage, Gore did not take questions from reporters, avoiding the issue of a potential 2008 presidential run. His aides repeatedly say he won't enter the race. Gore donated his share of the $1.5 million prize to the nonprofit.
“For my part, I will be doing everything I can to try to understand how to best use the honor and the recognition from this award as a way of speeding up the change in awareness and the change in urgency,” Gore said in brief remarks. “It is a planetary emergency and we have to act quickly.”
In announcing the award earlier in the day in Oslo, Norway, Nobel committee chairman Ole Danbolt Mjoes said the prize was not a slap at the Bush administration's current policies. Instead, he said it was about encouraging all countries “to think again and to say what can they do to conquer global warming.”
Gore is the first former vice president to win the Peace Prize since 1906 when Theodore Roosevelt, who by that time had become president, was awarded. Sitting Vice President Charles Gates Dawes won the prize in 1925. Former Presidents Jimmy Carter won it in 2002 and Woodrow Wilson in 1919.
Gore, who learned of his award from watching the live TV announcement - hearing his name amid the Norwegian - was not celebratory Friday. His tone was somber. He spoke beside his wife, Tipper, and four Stanford University climate scientists who were co-authors of the international climate report. Outside the building, schoolchildren held a sign saying, “Thank you Al.”
For years, there was little thanks.
From the late 1980s with his book “Earth in the Balance,” Gore championed the issue of global warming. He had monthly science seminars on it while vice president and helped negotiate the 1997 Kyoto Protocol that called for cuts in greenhouse gases.
“When he first started really working on the climate change issue, I remember he was ridiculed in the press and certainly by political opponents as some kind of kook out there in la-la land,” said federal climate scientist Tom Peterson, an IPCC co-author. “It's delightful that he's sharing this and he deserves it well. And it's nice to have his work being vindicated.”
Since his loss to George W. Bush in 2000, Gore put aside political aspirations and become a global warming evangelical. He traveled to more than 50 countries. He presented his slide show on global warming more than 1,000 times.
He turned that slide show into “An Inconvenient Truth.”
The film won praise but also generated controversy. On Wednesday, a British judge ruled in a lawsuit that it was OK to show the movie to students in school. High Court Judge Michael Burton said it was “substantially founded upon scientific research and fact” but presented in a “context of alarmism and exaggeration.” He said teachers must be given a written document explaining that.
More than 20 top climate scientists told the Associated Press last year that the film was generally accurate in its presentation of the science, although some were bothered by what they thought were a couple of exaggerations.
Gore's movie was deeply personal. It was about him after losing the 2000 election and about his travels, and he talked about the changing climate in a personal way.
“He has honed that message in a way that many scientists are jealous of,” said University of Michigan Dean Rosina Birnbaum. She was a top White House science aide to Gore and President Clinton. “He is a master communicator.”
Climate scientists said their work was cautious and rock-solid, confirmed with constant peer review, but it didn't grab people's attention.
“We need an advocate such as Al Gore to help present the work of scientists across the world,” said Bob Watson, former chairman of the IPCC and a top federal climate science adviser to the Clinton-Gore Administration.
Watson and Birnbaum, who regularly briefed Gore about global warming, described him as voracious, wanting to understand every detail about the science. Birnbaum recalled one Air Force Two journey with Gore and the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
“Gore was such a consummate scientist that he would keep asking and asking and asking deeper and deeper questions until at one point Jim Baker of NOAA and I ran back to our seats to go back through textbooks to get the answers,” Birnbaum said. “It was both exhilarating and exhausting to be part of his science team.”
Scientists and Nobel committee members said it was not a stretch to award the Peace Prize to Gore and the scientists. Studies by national security experts say a hotter world with changes in water and food supply can lead to wars and terrorism.
“We're already seeing the first climate wars, in the Sahel belt of Africa,” said Jan Egeland, a Norwegian peace mediator.
The man who beat Gore in 2000, President Bush, had no plans to call Gore to congratulate him. But spokesman Tony Fratto called it “an important recognition” for both Gore and the scientific panel.
Some in the shrinking community of global warming skeptics and those downplaying the issue, were dubious, however.
“I think it cheapens the Nobel Prize,” said William O'Keefe, chief executive officer of the conservative science-oriented think tank the Marshall Institute. O'Keefe, a former oil industry executive and current consultant to fossil fuel firms, called Gore's work “rife with errors.”
As he was leaving the alliance's office, Gore was asked whether the Nobel would quiet climate naysayers. He said the award would help the cause of fighting global warming overall: “I hope we have a chance to really kick into high gear.”
|
 |
 |
Add your comment now! Write your comment in the form below.
(Email address is for verification only. If you'd like to email a story, look for the link above)