Archived Story

Native insight: Textbook guides teachers on author's racial messages - Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008
By JODI RAVE of the Missoulian

It ain't easy being Indian. So says one of America's premier Native writers of contemporary Indian life.

To help explain the racial complexities that permeate Sherman Alexie's work, a textbook for teachers, “Sherman Alexie in the Classroom,” was recently published to help educators explore Native Americana in modern times, stories often told by Alexie with an acerbic twist.

To wit, says Alexie: “I rooted for John Wayne Š even though I knew he was going to kill his niece because she had been ‘soiled' by the Indians. Hell, I rooted for John Wayne because I understood why he wanted to kill his niece. I hated those Indians just as much as John Wayne did.”

So why would an Indian hate Indians?

English literature professors and teachers Heather Bruce, Anna Baldwin and Christabel Umphrey explain this paradox in “Sherman Alexie in the Classroom,” a high school literature series published by the National Council of Teachers of English. The text examines Alexie's provocative body of work, ranging from poetry and novels to film scripts.

His magical imagination has paved the way for him to become a world-acclaimed best-selling novelist, spoken-word poet, stand-up comedian, and award-winning filmmaker and short story writer.

Alexie, who is of Spokane and Coeur d'Alene tribal heritage, often explores racism in his stories while simultaneously allowing his characters to deliver comedic punch lines.

In his most popular book to date, “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian,” the winner of the 2007 National Book Award for Young People's Literature, Alexie unleashes a tale of adolescent trials told by a geeky kid born into this world with “brain grease.”

The ungainly boy with too-big feet is rejected by his peers. But, he ultimately prevails as a hero of sorts.

Authors of the teaching-Alexie guidebook say the text will help non-Native teachers and students “work through their white guilt and develop anti-racist perspectives.”

On Tuesday, Carla Hinman's freshman class at Hellgate High School began reading from “Part-Time Indian.”

Hinman began the class discussion by asking students about a series of quotes from chapter one of Alexie's book. The teacher then asked students to explain what they thought the book might be about.

Each student group agreed on a recurrent theme: prejudice and racism.

On Friday, 75 students at Hellgate will meet and read Alexie's work in recognition of Montana's Native American Heritage Day. Each student has received copies of the “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian,” which is said to be an autobiographical sketch of Alexie's life while growing up on the Spokane Reservation in eastern Washington.

Fourteen-year-old Hannah Wolf, a student in Hinman's class, said she's already read the book once.

“It was kind of depressing in the first two chapters. It made me cry,” she said. “But toward the middle of the book he started standing up for himself.”

Alexie's “stories resonate with students of all races,” said Bruce, an English professor at the University of Montana. “They relate to his sarcasm and to his humor. It kind of has a comedy channel feel to it. Other writers are far more serious and it's difficult for young people to engage.”

Bruce, also director of the Montana Writing Project, is one of five nationwide recipients of a $10,000 teacher development grant from the McCarthey Dressman Education Foundation. It was announced on Tuesday that she will use the money for a writing project initiative to create a K-12 curriculum to help students learn more about Montana's Native people while engaging in “reading, writing and research practices that stand at the heart of inquiry and literacy.”

Authors like Alexie have helped educators like Bruce bring a discussion of Native life into the classroom.

Still, others warn that Alexie's words shouldn't be taken too seriously.

Critics routinely argue that he perpetuates and exaggerates reservation life. Chapter Six in “Sherman Alexie in the Classroom” offers some insightful criticisms of his work. Gloria Bird, a Spokane Indian, writes that just because someone is a Native writer doesn't mean they automatically produce an authentic version of Native life.

Even so, Alexie has put Native life, good and bad, before an international audience of readers. And he's given a voice to one of the most invisible populations in the United States.

Anna Baldwin, a teacher at Arlee High School on the Flathead Reservation, said if not for Alexie, some of her students would never have read a book from cover to cover.

“My students respond to them,” said Baldwin, a co-author of the teaching-Alexie textbook. “The books are so contemporary - and it's the whole reservation culture that is embedded in the books. Sherman Alexie's work is like a door for some kids to get into literature.”

Reporter Jodi Rave can be reached at 1-800-366-7186 or jodi.rave@lee.net.


Add your comment now! Write your comment in the form below.
(Email address is for verification only. If you'd like to email a story, look for the link above)
Current Word Count:
   

lsmith wrote on Sep 30, 2008 2:20 PM:

" Looks and words can be deceptive as can hidden agendas. As one of the original co-authors of the "Alexie in the Classroom," I recognized this effort as a convenient way for the lead author, Dr. Heather Bruce, Montana Writing Project Director, to satisfy departmental publishing obligations while on sabbatical from the University of Montana. As the lone Native spokesperson, Sicangu Lakota, I realized that I had little to no control over the project's final outcome, both at the local level and at the national level. Dr. Bruce refused to commit any time to my frequent requests to engage in conversations critical to how Alexie might be read and interpreted by a non-Native readership whose only understanding of the Indigenous reality is one shaped by the media, American literature and its stereotyped imagery. I withdrew. This is another prime example of colonization and Indian Education for All is the new frontier for exploitation. It appears that the privilege of white academics whose credentials and pretenses of empathy for social justice and Native peoples is all that is necessary to garner acclaim at the expense of the very people it claims to represent. Why is it that it is so much easier to love Indians at a distance or through fictional renderings than up close and personal through the work of face to face dialogue? Decolonization does not have a chance until we, as Native peoples, question our position in this system and hold the colonizer accountable. "


|

Subscribe to the Missoulian today — get 2 weeks free!