John Masterson, who chairs the citizen oversight committee, presented the second biannual report on the initiative's progress Wednesday during the weekly meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. The measure, dubbed Initiative 2, won the support of 53 percent of Missoula voters in November 2006.
Masterson pointed to a 27 percent increase in marijuana enforcement within Missoula County as evidence that the voter-approved initiative has gone unheeded.
Law enforcement officials have maintained that, in general, officers do not seek to make arrests or issue citations for personal marijuana use. Rather, police encounter the drug while investigating other offenses.
The report also shows that marijuana enforcement reported by the county sheriff's department has decreased by 13 percent in the measure's second year. The overall increase in marijuana enforcement, then, is due to “skyrocketing” arrests and citations by the Missoula Police Department, an entity not affected by the countywide measure.
While committee members acknowledge that city police are not required to make marijuana enforcement a lowest priority, the report calls the results “disappointing, particularly to city residents, where the initiative passed overwhelmingly in most precincts.”
Marijuana incidents involving the Missoula Police Department have risen more than 60 percent in the last year, according to the report.
The report also commends efforts by Missoula County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg, who last year instructed prosecutors to charge misdemeanor marijuana cases on a lowest-priority basis, but only when marijuana is the sole offense.
Since June 2008, defendants in 16 cases have accepted deferred prosecution agreements, while no action was taken in 27 cases.
The nine-member oversight committee also found that the typical arrest in Missoula County for marijuana possession involves small, personal amounts - an average of 2 grams, which is lighter in weight than a single 10-cent coin, Masterson said.
In one instance reported in January, police seized less than 1 gram of marijuana residue from the console of a man's vehicle, retrieving the substance with a strip of white tape.
Eighty percent of individuals involved in marijuana incidents in the first half of 2008 were under the age of 30, the report concludes, while nearly half were between the ages of 18 and 22.
Meanwhile, nonwhites were roughly five times more likely than whites to be involved in a misdemeanor marijuana incident in Missoula County, with Native Americans involved in 13.4 percent of the incidents, while representing just 2.6 percent of Missoula County's population.
“When depicted as ratios of incidents per population, it becomes apparent that nonwhites are much more likely to be involved in an adult misdemeanor marijuana incident,” the report concludes.
Reporter Tristan Scott can be reached at 523-5264 or at tscott@missoulian.com.
|
![]() |
Add your comment now! Write your comment in the form below.
(Email address is for verification only. If you'd like to email a story, look for the link above)
dweezil222 wrote on Dec 11, 2008 8:00 AM:
g wrote on Dec 11, 2008 8:46 AM:
Bryan wrote on Dec 11, 2008 9:36 AM:
BLF10 wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:14 AM:
Ray wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:19 AM:
tm2004 wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:49 AM:
growup wrote on Dec 11, 2008 1:00 PM:
Why do you think they call it dope. In case you haven't noticed all these pothead types have this psudeo-intellectual air about them, but talk in mindless circles and screwup whatever it is there doing, and have trouble tuning their own guitar at the gig...or like that pothead auto-mechanic who always managaes to screw your car up more than fix it.... you know the type.
The way I look at it is, you're not getting arested for smokeing dope, you're getting arrested for being an idiot.
Growup already the 60s are over ! "
Local Cop wrote on Dec 11, 2008 1:46 PM:
mike wrote on Dec 11, 2008 3:51 PM:
Bryan writes "Marijuana is a multi-billion dollar drug business that fuels theft, homicide, kidnappings and the like, even here in Montana". Hey wait a minute, the only reason it's that kind of drug business is BECAUSE of prohibition. Violence caused by marijuana use is rare. Seems to me Bryan is confusing the real problem of black market related violence caused by marijuana prohibition with the effects of the drug itself. If done deliberately, that's called not playing fair. To use another sports metaphor, a level playing field between alcohol and cannabis would be more than fair to alcohol. "
Bryan wrote on Dec 11, 2008 5:15 PM:
weirdlogic wrote on Dec 11, 2008 6:26 PM:
Growup and put out that doobie, I'm sure it ain't doing your lungs any good, not to mention your wallet. Beside aren't you liberal types the ones trying to making smoking illegal, oh but excuse me it's ok for you to smoke pot...what a bunch of hypocrites.
Personaly I think all drugs should be legal, I also think there should be NO public assistance or help for drug users, if they wanna use it fine - just don't ask me for any help, if you fall in the gut, you can stay there, it's your life, smoke you brains out, if you have any left.
I've know people most of my life that have smoked pot - for the most part they're all air-heads, In odd sort of way it does destroy brain cells. "
ohmynow wrote on Dec 11, 2008 6:43 PM:
And if we can round up enough morons to vote on it can we pass a medical meth law ?
And what doseage should I take for my lung cancer pain with the pot I got off of that street dealer last week - he said it's pretty good stuff, but there wasn't any doseage amounts or warnings on the label, maybe - one toke, two tokes., three, or just smoke it to oblivion. You freakin' idiots, how would you like it if our medical community gave you perscripts and told you to go get it filled by some dealer on the corner.
That's why pot is against the law - because it turns society into a bunch morons who start thinking they are doctors. Actually I thought I was an astonaut when I use to smoke pot. "
me wrote on Dec 11, 2008 7:22 PM:
Ray wrote on Dec 11, 2008 9:32 PM:
Real Cop wrote on Dec 11, 2008 10:08 PM:
skippy wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:33 PM:
oliver steinberg wrote on Dec 12, 2008 2:22 AM:
This is a good example of what I have always said. Prohibition and a free society are mutually exclusive. Prohibitionists are hysterically convinced that they must dictate to other people what they may eat, drink, or smoke. The prohibitionists do not recognize the right of a free people to repeal unjust laws. They would sooner destroy democratic government than allow citizens to enjoy the use of a natural, God-given herb. They are insane. "
oliver steinberg wrote on Dec 12, 2008 2:35 AM:
Never heard that one before, did you? So THAT is why "marijuana" was outlawed in Montana. In 2004, the law was modified by VOTE OF THE PEOPLE, to permit medical use under a doctor's direction. Medical marijuana got more votes in Montana than George W. Bush. In California in 1996, medical pot got more votes than Bill Clinton. In Michigan this year, it got more votes than Barack Obama. In each case, the prohibitionists refuse to accept that the majority of the American people have the right to CHANGE the law . . . the law rooted in bigotry and ignorance and "reefer madness" hysteria. "
J.D. Lape wrote on Dec 12, 2008 7:22 AM:
growup wrote on Dec 12, 2008 1:14 PM:
I just think that it's patheticaly childish. I did it when I was a kid, fortunately I grew out of it.
As far as the comparisions to alcohol..those people screw their lives up on alcohol are just as childish as you pot heads.
I just think back about the friends I had when I blew pot and some of the acquintences I have that still smoke it - they're airheads, psuedo-intellects, they fall for the dumbest stuff, still into phony insincere peace movements... and are ...Yes childish...
Us none smokers just laugh at you people, you're ignorance is refreshing in an entertaining sort of way. ..."Like oh wow man"... the 60s are over.
Pot is just another self centered 60's hippy self indulgence. An ego post for most, they all they they are so cool, hippy, alternative...Bascialy acting like kids that never grew up.
And before you give the usual bit about 'hate' 'pigs' 'facist'.......I'll just say "peace" to you. "
david wrote on Dec 19, 2008 12:05 PM:
mtpromises wrote on Dec 26, 2008 8:56 AM:
"METRO NEWS BRIEFS: CONNECTICUT; Judge Rules That Police Can Bar High I.Q. Scores
A Federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by a man who was barred from the New London police force because he scored too high on an intelligence test. In a ruling made public on Tuesday, Judge Peter C. Dorsey of the United States District Court in New Haven agreed that the plaintiff, Robert Jordan, was denied an opportunity to interview for a police job because of his high test scores. But he said that that did not mean Mr. Jordan was a victim of discrimination. Judge Dorsey ruled that Mr. Jordan was not denied equal protection because the city of New London applied the same standard to everyone: anyone who scored too high was rejected. Mr. Jordan, 48, who has a bachelor's degree in literature and is an officer with the State Department of Corrections, said he was considering an appeal. ''I was eliminated on the basis of my intellectual makeup,'' he said. ''It's the same as discrimination on the basis of gender or religion or race.''
MAYBE THAT'S WHY????? "


oksf wrote on Dec 11, 2008 12:20 AM: