“The consensus of (our group) was that we did not see a lot of change coming unless we went to a single-payer, universal health system,” said Deborah Hanson of Miles City, who organized a meeting of local citizens at the behest of Obama's transition team. “That was sort of a general consensus - knowing, of course, that may not happen.”
The Miles City meeting, held Dec. 21 at Hanson's home, was one of several in Montana and thousands held across the nation during the last two weeks of December.
The feedback will be compiled in a report delivered to Obama and “will help shape the health care reform process,” an official with his transition team said last week.
A Medicare for all system, also referred to as a single-payer system, would offer health coverage for all Americans, funded largely by some sort of broad-based tax. Citizens would choose their own doctor and caregivers, and bills would be paid by the national plan.
Obama has not proposed such a reform and said he probably wouldn't support it. U.S. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who has proposed wide-ranging health reforms, has said a single-payer system is “off the table” for consideration.
Both Obama and Baucus have said they support reforms that maintain America's system of private health insurance provided by employers, along with publicly funded programs like Medicare for the elderly and Medicaid for the poor.
But at several of the Montana health care meetings held in conjunction with the Obama transition team, attendees said a Medicare-style program should be extended to everyone.
The Lee Newspapers State Bureau spoke with organizers of meetings in Missoula, Bozeman, Helena and Miles City. At three of the meetings, attendees agreed that a national, single-payer system is the reform most likely to solve problems with our current system, such as lack of coverage for many, lack of access to care, lack of preventive care and high costs.
In fact, in Helena, attendees said the biggest problem with the current system is its reliance on private health insurance through employers.
Marshall Mayer, an Internet marketer who organized the Dec. 28 meeting attended by 25 people, said small-business owners at the meeting said they shouldn't have to shop for health coverage for their employees - especially as it's becoming more and more unaffordable.
“They really felt strongly about that,” he said. “They said, ‘I don't want to be put in this position. I want to do my own business.' ”
“Paying into a public pool, such as Medicare (for all), is the much-preferred route,” the group's report to Obama said. “No one in our group opposed paying more taxes in exchange for access to a quality health care system.”
In Missoula, only four people attended a meeting organized by retired urologist Roger Munro, although three of them, including Munro, were physicians or retired physicians.
Munro said he was surprised his group agreed that a single-payer system is the only reform that tackles “all sides of the problem: access, cost and administrative efficiency.”
He also said group members wondered how they could convince Baucus that single-payer should not be “off the table.”
“We felt that the public and the medical care community are much more receptive to this solution than our elected representatives seem to understand,” Munro wrote in his brief report to the Obama transition team.
The group in Bozeman, organized by retired physician Richard Damon, did not come to a consensus on a reform model, but employer-based insurance “is not very well-received” among those at the meeting, Damon said.
Hanson said 15 people attended the meeting at her and her husband Terry's home in Miles City, some of them health care professionals and most of them Democrats.
Putting “Band-Aids” on the current system isn't really fixing it, her group members felt, and health insurance should not be tied to where you work or whether you work, she said.
Hanson works at her husband's law office and they own and manage some rental property in Miles City. She said they pay $12,000 a year for health insurance, with a $2,500 deductible.
“Over the last 10 years we've paid at least $100,000 for health insurance, and we're not (even) sick,” she said “That's where our economic development money goes.”
Yet while the group felt some form of national health insurance was the way to go, it must be paired up with strong initiatives for prevention, to push people to lead healthier lifestyles and thus impose lesser costs on the system, she added.
|
![]() |
Add your comment now! Write your comment in the form below.
(Email address is for verification only. If you'd like to email a story, look for the link above)
farmerziffel wrote on Jan 8, 2009 7:34 AM:
" Good luck - the new doctors in the valley have talked about having so much debt that they cannot no longer accept Medicare patients, but little do they know because it is not all about money in their world, it is about people. "
erik m wrote on Jan 8, 2009 12:11 PM:
" Socialize, socialize, socialize. Oh the government just wants you to take this little pill and it will all be better. Name one government entity that runs more efficiently than the private sector and I will get excited about this, in fact I will do a cart wheel. Mabye I will retire to sit around and let all the working stiffs figure it out for me. But why stop here? I want a "Full Gass can for all". This way I can get health care and go ride my snowmobile everywhere while the rest of the world figures it out. "
Vrede RN wrote on Jan 8, 2009 12:35 PM:
" erik m: "Name one government entity that runs more efficiently than the private sector and I will get excited about this..."
Medicare/Medicaid, VA overhead: 5-7%
Private insurance overhead, fat cat profit: 25-30% "
Medicare/Medicaid, VA overhead: 5-7%
Private insurance overhead, fat cat profit: 25-30% "
Brian wrote on Jan 8, 2009 2:16 PM:
" Why would a healthy person pay $12000 a year for health insurance? Hanson's, if you read this please get ahold of me, I'll get you a way better deal on some health coverage and you can pay me a small commission for holding your hand. Why are people who are so seemingly well educated making such horribly dumb financial decisions?
You could have 100,000 in an HSA with a high deductible insurance and be earning interest on money you have just wasted, all without any government assistance. "
You could have 100,000 in an HSA with a high deductible insurance and be earning interest on money you have just wasted, all without any government assistance. "
mikanally wrote on Jan 11, 2009 3:22 PM:
" I live in Canada, and one thing I don't quite understand is this: if so many people in America wanted a single payer system why did they vote for Obama? And why would they expect him to change his political platform when he already has a mandate from the people? "


Tristan wrote on Jan 8, 2009 12:11 AM: